Chapter 6
Main Menu   Table Of Contents



Ophthalmologists must have a thorough understanding of eye alignment, not only for the management of eye conditions, but also for the overall health of a patient, which may depend on an accurate assessment. Diagnosing a small-angle esotropia in a child is essential in treating the amblyopia often associated with that condition. The appreciation of lateral incomitance in a small-angle esotropia, an association that can mark a subtle sixth nerve palsy, may be the earliest sign of an intracranial mass. Excellent patient care requires that an ophthalmologist be familiar with the concepts of ocular alignment and possess the ability to accurately quantify eye deviations.
Back to Top


  1. Orthophoria: The eyes are perfectly aligned, and no deviation occurs, even when the fusion reflex is disrupted.
  2. Heterophoria and Heterotropia: Misalignment compensated for by the fusion reflex keeps the deviation in heterophoria latent. Manifest misalignment is heterotropia.
    1. Horizontal
      1. Esophoria or esotropia: convergent deviation of the visual axes
      2. Exophoria or exotropia: divergent deviation of the visual axes

    2. Vertical
      1. Right hyperphoria or hypertropia: right visual axis is deviated upward compared to the left
      2. Left hyperphoria or hypertropia: left visual axis is deviated upward compared to the right

    3. Torsional
      1. Incyclophoria or incyclotropia: superior poles of the corneas are tipped medially
      2. Excyclophoria or excyclotropia: superior poles of the corneas are tipped temporally


The methods used to determine the eye alignment in the primary position are varied and multiple. No single test invariably assesses the alignment accurately in all patients.

There are four basic types of alignment tests: the various cover tests, which depend on the fixation reflex; the corneal reflex tests, which are based on the ability of the curved corneal surface to reflect an examining light; the dissimilar image tests, which are based on the patient's response to diplopia produced by converting an isolated object of regard into different images on each retina; and the dissimilar target tests, which are based on the patient's response to the dissimilar images created by each eye viewing a different target.


Because the cover tests are based on the fixation ability of the eye, fixation ability must first be assessed. Patients without fixation ability in each eye (eccentric fixation) are unable to have eye alignment checked by cover tests. Also, the patient's accommodation must be controlled with an appropriate target. An accommodative target is a small target designed to control the patient's accommodation if the patient's response supplies clear vision; this target is required during the cover test. Advantages of cover testing include a high degree of interobserver repeatability, easy quantification using prisms, and the ability to accurately measure the angle of deviation in all fields of gaze.


The patient's right eye is covered while fixating a series of distant accommodative targets. After 2 to 3seconds, the right eye is uncovered and the left eye covered. When covering one eye, the examiner's attention is directed to the opposite, uncovered eye, looking for movement of this eye. An absence of movement of an eye when the other eye is covered (Fig. 1), occurring in both eyes, means that the patient does not have a heterotropia, but it does not differentiate between orthophoria and heterophoria. The alternate cover test is required to make this differentiation.

Fig. 1 Cover–uncover test. A. Examiner observes left eye while preparing to cover right eye. B. Right eye is covered. C. Right eye is uncovered. Right eye is observed as preparation is made to cover left eye. D. Left eye is covered.

Alternate Cover.

The basic principle of this test is to prevent fusion for the duration of the test. This is accomplished by constantly maintaining a cover over one or the other eye, shifting it swiftly from eye to eye while the examiner looks for movement of the uncovered eye as it assumes fixation (Fig. 2). The rapid shift applies only to the speed of movement of the cover and not to the duration it is held before the eye; in fact, the exam-iner should maintain the cover over each eye for 2 or 3 seconds before rapidly shifting it. No movement of either eye indicates orthophoria. The patient whose eye moves on alternate cover has either a heterophoria or heterotropia. Differentiation between the two requires the cover–uncover test because there is not movement for either cover–uncover or alternate cover testing in orthophoria. The direction of the shift identifies the type of heterophoria or heterotropia. A temporal horizontal shift is esophoria or esotropia, a nasal shift is exophoria or exotropia, and right or left hyperphoria or hypertropia is the movement of the right or the left eye downward. If both eyes make movements downward, it is called dissociated vertical deviation or hypertropia (see Index).

Fig. 2 Alternate cover test. Cover before right eye (A) is rapidly transferred to left eye (B) as examiner observes right eye for any shift it may make to establish fixation. Alternately transferring the cover from eye to eye while observing the uncovered eye discloses any heterodeviation that may be present, provided each eye can centrally fixate. C. Introducing a prism before one eye allows measurement of the heterodeviation (prism and alternate cover test).

Having identified a heterodeviation, the next step is to measure the quantity of misalignment by neutralizing the shift with prism power. The prism is held in the examiner's left hand in front of the patient's right eye. The examiner's right hand handles the alternate cover. The prism or prism powers are adjusted until the motion of the eyes on alternate cover is eliminated (Fig. 2C). Base-out prisms are used to compensate for an esodeviation, base-in for an exodeviation, base-down before the right eye for a right hyperdeviation, and base-up for a left hyperdeviation. Horizontal and vertical prism powers can be combined if loose prisms are used. A prism bar is handy, but it does not lend itself to neutralizing combined horizontal and vertical deviations nor is it sufficient to compensate for horizontal deviations greater than 45Δ or vertical deviations greater than 25Δ. The loose prisms must be combined for larger deviations. Vertical deviations seldom exceed 25Δ, but horizontal tropias greater than 40Δ are very common. The most convenient way for the examiner to hold combined horizontal prisms is not to superimpose them before one eye but instead to grasp the horizontal prisms either apex-to-apex (esotropia) or base-to-base (exotropia) between the thumb and index finger of the left hand, allowing the finger and thumb to cup around the patient's right eye, with one prism being positioned before each eye. The area of contact between the apexes or bases then is in the midline in front of the patient's nose. Prisms cannot neutralize cyclodeviations.

Prism measurement of the strabismic angle is the most accurate technique for measurement. However, prism measurements are subject to error. Thompson and Guyton1 describe several potential sources of error. The angle at which the prism is held in front of the patient can influence the quantification of a deviation, especially with large angles. Two commonly used positions are the Prentice, in which the prism is held perpendicular to the line of sight of the nonfixating eye, and the frontal plane position, in which the prism is held parallel to the plane of the patient's face. In addition, the position of minimum deviation is reached when the angle of light incident to a prism is the same as that exiting. Glass prisms, although less common in clinical practice, are calibrated for the Prentice position, as are some prism bars2, whereas plastic prisms are calibrated for the angle of minimum deviation. It can be difficult to measure the angle of incident and exiting light from a prism, but in practice, the frontal plane position differs little from the angle of minimum deviation. However, holding a prism calibrated for the Prentice position in the position of minimum deviation can result in a significant overestimation of the deviation, especially for larger angles.

Strabismic angles larger than 50 prism diopters present another problem. It may be tempting to stack two prisms on top of one another and use their combined total to quantify the angle. However, this can seriously bias the result because the stacked prisms will not be held in the angle to which they are calibrated.1 Also, placing prisms in front of each other will not be correct, because angles measured in prism diopters are not additive. Fortunately, it is possible to stack horizontal and vertical prisms for complex strabismus, as the vectors are perpendicular to one another. Measurements at near are similarly subject to error.3 Because prism diopters are calculated as the distance light is bent over a distance of 1 meter, shortening the distance to a target by holding it too far from the eye can result in an overestimation of the true angle of deviation. More prism power is required to neutralize a near deviation if the prism is held several centimeters from the cornea.

Simultaneous Prism and Cover.

This test is useful in a patient having a small-angle heterotropia, commonly encountered in esotropes. The simultaneous prism and cover test is an attempt to measure the actual heterotropia angle present under normal seeing conditions while both eyes are uncovered. As the fixating eye is covered, a prism of known power is slipped simultaneously before the opposite eye with its base in the appropriate direction to compensate for the heterotropia. No movement occurs as the eye behind the prism takes up fixation when the prism power selected equals the heterotropia angle. This measurement is important because of a prevalent condition known as the monofixation syndrome.4 Some patients who have this syndrome are small-angle heterotropes; among these are some who reduce their larger fusion-free angle (as determined by alternate cover) to a smaller angle during normal seeing conditions. For example, the esotropia may measure 14Δ by alternate cover, but the simultaneous prism and cover may reveal 4Δ esotropia that the patient maintains with both eyes open.


Studying the reflection of an examining light provides information regarding the alignment of the eyes in patients who cannot cooperate sufficiently to perform the alternate cover test or who lack fixation ability due to amblyopia. Four techniques may be employed using this principle. The Hirschberg test grossly estimates the angle of strabismus according to the degree of displacement away from the pupillary center at which the examiner views the corneal reflection in the deviated eye. Initially described by Hirschberg in the 19th century using a candle flame,5,6 currently a bright fixation light is placed before the eyes of the patient. The examiner observes the position of the light reflex in the nonfixating eye, as compared with the fixating eye. A second method was introduced by Krimsky7 as a more rigorous method of quantifying a deviated corneal light reflex. The Krimsky test entails introducing prisms before either one or both eyes to center the corneal reflections in the pupil of each eye. The third is a perimeter method, and the fourth is a major amblyoscope method. In the latter two methods, the alignment is read on the machine at the point the corneal reflections are centered in the pupils. The unit of strabismic deviation according to the Hirschberg and perimeter tests is degrees; for the Krimsky and major amblyoscope tests it is prism diopters.

Hirschberg Method.

A light reflected in the deviated eye nearer the pupillary center than the margin is estimated to be a 5° to 6° deviation, at the pupillary margin it is 12° to 15°, midway between pupillary margin and limbus it is 25°, at the limbus it is 45° to 60°, and beyond the limbus it is 60° to 80° (Fig. 3). Traditionally, each 1-mm deviation of light reflex displacement away from the proper position was considered to represent 7° or 15 prism diopters, without empirical validation.8 However, using flash photographs with millimeter rulers included for standardization, Brodie6 estimated a Hirschberg ratio of 21 prism diopters/mm, then supported this number theoretically. This angle correlates highly with that derived from alternate prism and cover testing.9

Fig. 3 Hirschberg corneal reflex test.

Krimsky Method.

The corneal reflections of the examining light are compared in regard to the location of the pupil in each eye. Dissimilar positions are indicative of strabismus. By placing proper prism power before either one or both eyes simultaneously, the reflection can be similarly positioned (Fig. 4); this is a direct reading of the estimated squint angle. Because observation of the corneal light reflex through a prism may be difficult, von Noorden10 recommends placing the prism over the fixating eye. The Krimsky test is especially useful in younger patients, as well as patients who are unable to maintain concentration for prolonged prism and alternate cover testing and for patients with diminished central fixation in one or both eyes.

Fig. 4 Krimsky corneal reflex test. A. Congenital esotropic infant. B. Measuring esotropic angle.

Both the Hirschberg and Krimsky tests have substantial limitations, the most significant of which is lack of interobserver consistency. A study11 comparing estimates of strabismic angle among 16 very experienced strabismologists found wide variability, especially using the Hirschberg method for larger angles, whereas underestimates were commonly produced. In general, the Krimsky test was more accurate than the Hirschberg test, although it was accurate less than 50% of the time. Another study12 found significant underestimation of the strabismic angle using the Krimsky method, but the amount of underestimation varied with the observer.

Perimeter Method.

The perimeter method requires the patient to steadily fixate the zero mark on the perimeter with the preferred eye while the examiner moves an examining light and his aligning eye together along the back side of the perimeter arc. At the point on the arc where the corneal reflection of the light appears located in the pupillary center of the deviated eye, the perimeter arc marking measures the squint angle in degrees (Fig. 5).

Fig. 5 Perimeter corneal reflex test.

Major Amblyoscope Method.

The amblyoscope is basically a refined haploscopic device that originally consisted of a median septum between the two eyes plus angled mirrors that reflected separate targets into each eye. The present-day amblyoscope, instead of using a septum and mirrors, has a separate tube for each eye with a housing at the distal end of each tube in which it is possible to insert an assortment of targets to be observed individually by each eye. Further refinements, such as separate illumination of each target that is capable of being varied by rheostats and tubes that are mounted so they can be deflected in any plane and the quantity of deflection read directly from calibrated scales, make this instrument a major amblyoscope. Adjusting the tubes so that the corneal reflections of the illumination within the target housing is centered in each pupil (Fig. 6) gives the examiner a direct reading of the patient's misalignment from the instrument's scales. Regardless of which corneal reflex technique is used, consideration must be given to the angle kappa. Because the fixation axis of the eye is not usually the exact center of the pupil, the corneal light reflex is not centered and is usually slightly nasal to the center of the pupil.3 The angle formed by an imaginary perpendicular line through the true pupillary center and the fixation axis is the angle kappa (Fig. 7). A nasal angle kappa is designated as positive and a temporal angle as negative. It can be measured by any one of the preceding methods. Corneal light reflex testing will demonstrate only the manifest portion of the deviation. Because fusion is not disrupted, the phoria component will be hidden. A situation in which a grossly positive angle kappa may be encountered is with the retinal dragging associated with retinopathy of prematurity. Because the macula may be displaced temporally, the fixation axis of the eye may be displaced even more from the papillary axis, creating a pseudoexotropia.

Fig. 6 Major amblyoscope corneal reflex test.

Fig. 7 Angle kappa.

Both horizontal and vertical misalignments can be studied by the corneal reflex methods, but the examiner is unable to use these methods in the study of the cyclodeviations.


The same fixation target, which is simultaneously presented to each eye, is converted into dissimilar images on the right and the left retina for the purpose of making fusion difficult or impossible. The Maddox rod test and the red glass test are two commonly used testing methods based on making the one object of regard project as dissimilar retinal images. Both tests are of value in assessing alignment only if the status of the retinal correspondence is known.

Maddox Rod.

The Maddox rod is a ribbed lens, the “washboard” appearance of which converts a spot of light into a streak. The streak is seen by the patient 90° away from the axes of the multiple cylinders. The rod is placed before one eye as the other eye continues to fixate the small spot source of light; a streak is seen to pass through the light if there is no deviation in the plane being tested. A horizontal streak (ribbing of the Maddox rod is vertical) checks vertical plane alignment (Fig. 8), and a vertical streak (ribbing of the Maddox rod is horizontal) checks the horizontal plane alignment. If the streak appears displaced away from the light, a misalignment exists. Whether the misalignment is a phoria or a tropia cannot be determined because fusion is precluded in this test. In the horizontal plane testing, a homonymous diplopia indicates esodeviation, and heteronymous diplopia indicates exodeviation. In the vertical plane testing, the streak seen by the hyperdeviated eye appears lower than the light and vice versa for the hypodeviated eye. Prisms are used to eliminate the horizontal or vertical diplopia, yielding a direct measure of the deviation if the retinal correspondence is normal. Cyclodeviations can be checked by placing a Maddox rod, preferably one red and the other white, before each eye at the same axis setting for each eye. If the axes of the two Maddox rods are set at 90 (Fig. 9), the red and white streaks appear on different axes in cyclodeviation. By adjustment in the axis settings of the two Maddox rods they are made to appear parallel; thus the degree of cyclodeviation can be determined.

Fig. 8 Maddox rod positioned in trial frame for investigation of vertical deviation.

Fig. 9 Double Maddox rod.

The Maddox rod test is particularly helpful in superior oblique palsy. Most commonly the paretic eye shows excyclotorsion on double Maddox rod testing, but if the patient fixates with the paretic eye, possibly the nonparetic eye will measure excyclotorsion.14 High amounts of excyclotorsion suggest bilateral superior oblique palsy. Although no absolute amount of excyclotorsion can be used to differentiate a unilateral from a bilateral superior oblique palsy, one study found a 90% probability of a superior oblique palsy being bilateral if the excyclotorsion measured in downgaze was greater than 20°.15 Mitchell and Parks16 suggested that 10° or more of excyclotorsion in the primary position was consistent with bilateral superior oblique palsy.

Red Filter.

While the patient fixates a small spot source of light, a red lens is placed before one of the eyes (Fig. 10). This test accomplishes the same thing as the Maddox rod in the horizontal and vertical deviations, but it is of no value in investigating cyclodeviations. It is less likely to disrupt fusion than the Maddox rod because only the color and the intensity of the images are made dissimilar whereas the contour of the images in the right and the left eye remains the same. The patient can fuse the white and the red light into a “pink” light. Prisms are used to eliminate the horizontal or vertical diplopia, yielding a direct measure of the deviation if the retinal correspondence is normal.

Fig. 10 Red filter in trial frame.


A number of different techniques for evaluating alignment are based on the presentation of different targets to the right and the left eye while the patient adjusts the projection device to superimpose the dissimilar images. If the retinal correspondence is normal, the point at which the images appear superimposed provides a direct reading of the patient's alignment. The two most widely used methods employing this principle are the Lancaster red-green projectors and the major amblyoscope.

Lancaster Red-Green Projectors.

One projector shines a red target and the other a green target on a white screen marked with a grid calibrated in prism diopters; the screen is 1 meter from the patient. The targets, of similar contour and intensity, are viewed by the patient with red-green spectacles (red filter before one eye and green before the other). The patient adjusts the targets so they appear superimposed (Fig. 11), thus affording a direct reading of any deviation. Horizontal, vertical, and torsional deviations are well revealed because the targets are linear, 2 to 3 cm in length.17

Fig. 11 Lancaster red-green projectors. A. Projectors with red-green spectacles. B. Grid screen. C. While looking through a red filter before one eye and a green filter before the other, the patient attempts to project his green target so that it appears superimposed upon the red target projected by the examiner. A direct reading of the heterodeviation is made from the separation of the targets as they project upon the screen.

Major Amblyoscope.

The patient views the dissimilar targets, which are simultaneously deposited in the housing of each tube, and adjusts them so that the images (e.g., bird and cage, car and garage, fish and bowl) are superimposed (Fig. 5, 6, and 7A). If the retinal correspondence is normal, the horizontal, vertical, and torsional deviations are read directly from the scales on the instrument that records the deflections of the tubes away from zero in these three planes. Furthermore, the illumination of the tubes can be alternately flashed on and off, allowing only one eye to view the target at a time. By observing the movement of the eyes as they fixate first one and then the other target, the examiner can adjust the tubes to eliminate all movement (Fig. 12). This, in effect, is an alternate cover test; however, instead of using prisms to measure the quantity of deviation, it is recorded by the scales on the instrument.

Fig. 12 Major amblyoscope. Multiple controls allow variable illumination to each target housing, illumination of the tube to be alternately flashed on and off, and adjustments to be made for the patient's interpupillary distance and horizontal, vertical, and torsional plane deviation that is read directly from scales.

With the exception of testing methods using the major amblyoscope, primary position alignment may be investigated either while the head is erect or when it is tilted to either shoulder. The purpose of testing the alignment in the primary position with the head tilted is to study the effect of the utricular reflex in cyclovertical muscle deviations. The head is rotated about the coronal axis for 60° toward either shoulder, and the alignment is checked by cover tests, corneal reflex tests, dissimilar image tests, or the Lancaster red-green projectors.

Back to Top
The three secondary positions are near fixation, cardinal positions, and midline position.


The purpose of investigating near fixation is to study the effect that the convergence associated with accommodation (synkinetic near reflex) has on the alignment of the eyes. Therefore, only the horizontal plane (esodeviations and exodeviations) is of significance; the vertical plane (hyperdevia-tions) and torsional plane (cyclodeviations) are irrelevant.


The classifications of near fixation are as follows.

  1. Normal. The distant (primary position) and near position alignment are comparable.
  2. Abnormal. The distant and near position alignment are not comparable.
    1. Convergence excess: greater esodeviation at near than at distance
    2. Convergence insufficiency: greater exodeviation at near than at distance
    3. Divergence excess: greater exodeviation at distance than at near
    4. Divergence insufficiency: greater esodeviation at distance than at near


The near point usually chosen to study the near alignment is 0.33 meter from the eyes. The test must be conducted so that the accommodation is stimulated. This requires that the target have fine pattern detail, such as is found in small pictures, Snellen letters, numbers, and print. A small muscle light does not satisfy this requirement; therefore, for this measurement it is not used.

Because a light source is an unsatisfactory target for testing the near position, then the corneal reflex tests, dissimilar image tests, and the Lancaster projector tests are excluded for near testing. The only satisfactory tests for the near position are the cover test (cover–uncover, alternate cover, and simultaneous prism and cover) and the major amblyoscope if targets demanding foveal vision are used. To stimulate accommodation, –3.00 lenses are inserted before each eye, simulating a test performed at 0.33 meter.


The purpose of studying these six positions is to compare the prime mover of the one eye for each of these positions with the comparable prime mover of the other eye (Fig. 2, 3, and 4). Only the horizontal and vertical planes are tested; the torsional plane is disregarded.


The classifications of the cardinal positions are as follows.

  1. Normal. The horizontal and the vertical plane alignment are orthophoric in all six cardinal positions.
  2. Abnormal. There is a horizontal and/or a vertical plane misalignment in one or all of the six cardinal positions.
    1. Concomitant. The deviation is identical in all positions.
      1. Horizontal
        1. Esodeviation
        2. Exodeviation

      2. Vertical
        1. Right hyperdeviation
        2. Left hyperdeviation

    2. Nonconcomitant. The deviation varies in different gaze positions.
      1. Horizontal
        1. Esodeviation
        2. Exodeviation

      2. Vertical
        1. Right hyperdeviation
        2. Left hyperdeviation


Horizontal deviations are studied by comparing the alignment in approximately 30° right gaze and 30° left gaze. Vertical deviations are examined by measuring the alignment in not only 30° right and left gaze, but also in 30° up and right, down and right, up and left, and down and left. All measurements can be done at either distant fixation (6 meters) or near fixation (0.33 meter), it being unnecessary to do both. The particular tests may be cover tests (cover–uncover, alternate cover), corneal reflex tests (Hirschberg method, Krimsky method, perimeter method), dissimilar image tests (Maddox rod, red filter), or dissimilar target tests (Lancaster red-green projectors). The major amblyoscope study is performed with the eyes in the straight-ahead position; therefore, this technique cannot be used for investigating alignment in the cardinal positions.

The cover tests, dissimilar image tests, and Lancaster red-green projector tests may be performed either by maintaining the patient's head in the same position while the targets are moved or by maintaining the targets in the same position while the patient's head is turned and tipped in various directions with the eyes continuing to fixate on the target.

Some nonconcomitant deviations measure differently in the primary position, depending on whether the right or the left eye is fixating. When fixating with the eye that has normal muscles (primary deviation) the deviation is less than when fixating with the eye having the paretic muscle (secondary deviation); therefore, the secondary deviation exceeds the primary deviation. Apparently more innervation is required to drive the involved eye into the fixating primary position than to drive the uninvolved. Because the paretic muscle and its yoke receive equal innervational input and the normal muscle can move its eye much further than can the paretic muscle, the increased innervation fed into the paretic muscle to align the eye for primary position fixation results in the normal yoke muscle overdeviating the uninvolved eye.

The best way to mask the nonconcomitant deviation is to maintain the eyes in the gaze position which has the least deviation. This results in compensatory head posture. For example, a patient having a palsied right lateral rectus masks the abduction deficiency by maintaining the right eye in adduction; in order to see straight ahead while the eyes are in left gaze, the face is turned right. Compensatory postures of the eyes and head are simple in the case of an isolated palsy of a horizontal rectus, but this is not so for the other muscles. A simple compensatory elevation or depression of the eyes solves only part of the diplopia problem caused by an isolated, underacting vertical rectus or oblique. One must remember that the vertical action of these muscles is in either adduction or abduction, and in the direction of gaze opposite to the field of vertical action there is torsional action. In the primary position there is a combined cyclovertical action. There is a combined torsional and vertical diplopia in the primary position, becoming more torsional and less vertical in one direction of gaze and the reverse in the opposite direction of gaze. For example, the vertical diplopia caused by a paretic right superior oblique is alleviated by abducting the right eye. Although abduction is out of the depressor field of action of the superior oblique, it is in the position for maximal intorsion. Consequently, solving the vertical diplopia by assuming a horizontal gaze and compensatory turning of the face worsens the torsional diplopia. The reverse horizontal gaze and face turn diminishes the torsional diplopia but increases the vertical diplopia. This patient does two things to eliminate the cyclovertical diplopia. The head is tilted to the left and the eyes are elevated. The latter causes chin depression (Fig. 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, and 6). The left head tilt, by way of the utricular reflex, and the elevation of the eyes combine to mask the weak right eye intortor and depressor because each results in inhibitory innervation to the right superior oblique. Isolated cyclovertical muscle palsies, then, are associated with the combined compensatory head postures: chin elevation or depression and head tilt. The compensatory head posture caused by an ocular motility defect is responsible for the descriptive term ocular torticollis. However, palsy of an extraocular muscle is not the only ocular motility defect that causes ocular torticollis. Patients with congenital nystagmus frequently have ocular torticollis, carrying their head in a horizontal, a vertical, or a torsional plane to improve their vision by reducing the excursion of their uncontrollable oscillatory eye movements. A number of ocular motility defects other than palsy of an extraocular muscle that frequently are associated with ocular torticollis are included in the next section of the chapter.


Both horizontal and vertical plane deviations are studied in the up and down midline positions.


The classifications of midline positions are as follows:

  1. Normal. The horizontal and the vertical plane alignment are orthophoric in both straight upgaze and downgaze.
  2. Abnormal. A horizontal and/or a vertical plane misalignment is present in the upgaze position and/or the downgaze position.
    1. Horizontal
      1. A pattern
      2. V pattern

    2. Vertical
      1. Double elevator palsy
      2. Fibrosis of a vertical rectus muscle
      3. Myopathy due to thyroid disease
      4. Adherence syndrome
        1. Following fracture of orbital floor
        2. Following surgery of extraocular muscles
        3. Brown syndrome


The cover tests, the corneal reflex tests, the dissimilar image tests, and the dissimilar target tests are used to study the midline positions of 30° straight above the primary position and 30° below it. It is possible to use the major amblyoscope in performing the midline position analysis.

Both A or V horizontal deviations and vertical deviations may be minimized by positioning the eyes a certain number of degrees above or below the primary position, thus allowing the patient to obtain binocular vision. The chin is then raised or lowered to offset this compensatory eye position, resulting in a compensatory head posture. Therefore, ocular deviations that are influenced by upgaze or downgaze may cause an ocular torticollis characterized by either chin elevation or depression.

Back to Top

1. Thompson JT, Guyton DL: Ophthalmic prisms: Measurement errors and how to minimize them. Ophthalmol 90:204–210, 1983

2. Kaye SB, Ansons AM, Green JR, Wylie J: The prism bar-Prentice and frontal positions. Eye 3:404–408, 1989

3. Thompson JT, Guyton DL: Ophthalmic prisms: Deviant behavior at near. Ophthalmol 92:684–690, 1985

4. Parks MM: The monofixation syndrome. Trans Am Ophthalmol Soc 67:609–657, 1969

5. Hirschberg J: Beitrage zur Lehre vom Schielen und von der Schieloperation. Zentrallblatt fur Praktische Augenheilkunde 10:5, 1886

6. Brodie SE: Photographic calibration of the Hirschberg test. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 28:736–742, 1987

7. Krimsky E: The binocular examination of the young child. Am J Ophthalmol 26:624–625, 1943

8. Pratt-Johnson JA, Tillson G: Management of Strabismus and Amblyopia. 2nd ed. Thieme: New York, 2001: 52

9. DeRespinis PA, Naidu E, Brodie S: Calibration of Hirschberg test photographs under clinical conditions. Ophthalmol 96:944–949, 1989

10. von Noorden GK: Binocular Vision and Ocular Motility. 5th ed. Mosby: New York, 1996: 181

11. Choi RY, Kushner BJ: The accuracy of experienced strabismologists using the Hirschberg and Krimsky tests. Ophthalmol 105:1301–1306, 1998

12. Aouchiche K, Dankner SR: What's the difference? Krimsky vs alternate cover testing. Am Orthopic J 38:148–150, 1988

13. Giorianni F, Siracusano B, Cusmano R: The angle kappa in ametropia. New Trends Ophthalmol 3:27, 1988

14. Olivier P, von Noorden GK: Excyclotropia of the nonparetic eye in unilateral superior oblique muscle paralysis. Am J Ophthalmol 93: 30–33, 1982

15. Kraft SP, O'Reilly C, Quigley PL, Allan K, Eustis HS: Cyclotorsion in unilateral and bilateral superior oblique paresis. J Pediatr Ophthalmol Strabismus 30:361–367, 1993

16. Mitchell PR, Parks MM: Surgery for bilateral superior oblique palsy. Ophthalmology 89:484, 1982

17. Lancaster WB: Detecting, measuring plotting and interpreting ocular deviations. Arch Ophthalmol 22:867–880, 1939

Back to Top